2004 Ford E-150 vs. 2010 Ford F-150
To start off, 2010 Ford F-150 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford F-150 (310 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2004 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford E-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford F-150 weights approximately 283 kg more than 2004 Ford E-150. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford F-150 (494 Nm) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford E-150. (388 Nm). This means 2010 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-150 | 2010 Ford F-150 | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | E-150 | F-150 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Van | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 310 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 494 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 2127 kg | 2410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5885 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2004 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1887 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3670 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 98 L |