2004 Ford E-150 vs. 2010 Volkswagen Caddy
To start off, 2010 Volkswagen Caddy is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 2010 Volkswagen Caddy. (101 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2010 Volkswagen Caddy. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volkswagen Caddy weights approximately 180 kg more than 2004 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-150 (388 Nm) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Volkswagen Caddy. (148 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Volkswagen Caddy.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford E-150 | 2010 Volkswagen Caddy | |
| Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
| Model | E-150 | Caddy |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 101 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 388 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2127 kg | 2307 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 60 L |
