2004 Ford E-150 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Optra
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Optra is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-150 (225 HP) has 117 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Optra. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Optra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-150 weights approximately 866 kg more than 2012 Chevrolet Optra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-150 (388 Nm) has 238 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Optra. (150 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Optra.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-150 | 2012 Chevrolet Optra | |
Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
Model | E-150 | Optra |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 388 Nm | 150 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2127 kg | 1261 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 11.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 60 L |