2004 Ford E-150 vs. 2013 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2013 GMC Yukon is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 GMC Yukon (316 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 2004 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford E-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 GMC Yukon weights approximately 515 kg more than 2004 Ford E-150. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 GMC Yukon (454 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford E-150. (388 Nm). This means 2013 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-150 | 2013 GMC Yukon | |
Make | Ford | GMC |
Model | E-150 | Yukon |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 316 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 454 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2127 kg | 2642 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5649 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2009 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1962 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3302 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 9.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 14.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 119 L |