2004 Ford E-250 vs. 1960 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2004 Ford E-250 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1960 Jaguar XK. (187 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1960 Jaguar XK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 897 kg more than 1960 Jaguar XK. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Jaguar XK. (310 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Jaguar XK.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford E-250 | 1960 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | E-250 | XK |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 3442 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 389 Nm | 310 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 106 mm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2370 kg | 1473 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 11.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 90 L |
