2004 Ford E-250 vs. 1961 Jaguar MK X
To start off, 2004 Ford E-250 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Jaguar MK X (252 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2004 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford E-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 480 kg more than 1961 Jaguar MK X.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Jaguar MK X. (360 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Jaguar MK X.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-250 | 1961 Jaguar MK X | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | E-250 | MK X |
Year Released | 2004 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 3781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 389 Nm | 360 Nm |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2370 kg | 1890 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 11.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 90 L |