2004 Ford E-250 vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2004 Ford E-250 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1200 kg more than 1964 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford E-250 | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | E-250 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 389 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 76 mm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2370 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 64 L |
