2004 Ford E-250 vs. 1968 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 2004 Ford E-250 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-250 (225 HP) has 166 more horse power than 1968 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1968 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1340 kg more than 1968 Jeep CJ5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-250 | 1968 Jeep CJ5 | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | E-250 | CJ5 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1968 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 389 Nm | 145 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 2370 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2060 mm |