2004 Ford E-250 vs. 1968 Toyota Sport 800
To start off, 2004 Ford E-250 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Toyota Sport 800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Toyota Sport 800 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1968 Toyota Sport 800. (44 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1968 Toyota Sport 800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1788 kg more than 1968 Toyota Sport 800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 322 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Toyota Sport 800. (67 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Toyota Sport 800.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford E-250 | 1968 Toyota Sport 800 | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | E-250 | Sport 800 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 790 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 389 Nm | 67 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2370 kg | 582 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 3590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1470 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1180 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 75 L |
