2004 Ford E-250 vs. 1969 Skoda 110 L
To start off, 2004 Ford E-250 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Skoda 110 L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Skoda 110 L would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 1969 Skoda 110 L. (43 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1969 Skoda 110 L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1565 kg more than 1969 Skoda 110 L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 319 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Skoda 110 L. (70 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Skoda 110 L.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford E-250 | 1969 Skoda 110 L | |
| Make | Ford | Skoda |
| Model | E-250 | 110 L |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Torque | 389 Nm | 70 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 68.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 68 mm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2370 kg | 805 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 31 L |
