2004 Ford E-250 vs. 1975 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2004 Ford E-250 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1975 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1975 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1005 kg more than 1975 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Nissan Cedric. (143 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford E-250 | 1975 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | E-250 | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 2164 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 389 Nm | 143 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 2370 kg | 1365 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2700 mm |
