2004 Ford E-250 vs. 1980 Renault 14
To start off, 2004 Ford E-250 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Renault 14. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Renault 14 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1980 Renault 14. (58 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1980 Renault 14. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1505 kg more than 1980 Renault 14. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 297 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Renault 14. (92 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Renault 14.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford E-250 | 1980 Renault 14 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | E-250 | 14 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1980 |
| Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1218 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 58 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 389 Nm | 92 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 69 mm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2370 kg | 865 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 48 L |
