2004 Ford E-250 vs. 1986 Skoda L
To start off, 2004 Ford E-250 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Skoda L would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1986 Skoda L. (57 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1986 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1485 kg more than 1986 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 299 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Skoda L. (90 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-250 | 1986 Skoda L | |
Make | Ford | Skoda |
Model | E-250 | L |
Year Released | 2004 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1221 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 389 Nm | 90 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 72.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 72 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2370 kg | 885 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2410 mm |