2004 Ford E-250 vs. 1992 Mazda 626
To start off, 2004 Ford E-250 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1992 Mazda 626. (165 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1992 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1086 kg more than 1992 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mazda 626. (221 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-250 | 1992 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | E-250 | 626 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1992 |
Body Type | Van | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 389 Nm | 221 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 84.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 74 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2370 kg | 1284 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2620 mm |