2004 Ford E-250 vs. 1994 Mazda 323
To start off, 2004 Ford E-250 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1994 Mazda 323. (142 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1152 kg more than 1994 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda 323. (180 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-250 | 1994 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | E-250 | 323 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 142 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 389 Nm | 180 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 69.6 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2370 kg | 1218 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 55 L |