2004 Ford E-250 vs. 1998 Volvo C70
To start off, 2004 Ford E-250 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Volvo C70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Volvo C70 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1998 Volvo C70. (162 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1998 Volvo C70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 970 kg more than 1998 Volvo C70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Volvo C70. (230 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-250 | 1998 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | E-250 | C70 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1998 |
Body Type | Van | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 162 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 389 Nm | 230 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 77 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2370 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 68 L |