2004 Ford E-250 vs. 1999 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2004 Ford E-250 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Jaguar XK (291 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 2004 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford E-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 800 kg more than 1999 Jaguar XK.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Jaguar XK (393 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford E-250. (389 Nm). This means 1999 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford E-250.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford E-250 | 1999 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | E-250 | XK |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1999 |
| Body Type | Van | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 3996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 291 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 389 Nm | 393 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 86 mm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2370 kg | 1570 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3040 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 9.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 75 L |
