2004 Ford E-250 vs. 2002 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2004 Ford E-250 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mercedes-Benz E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mercedes-Benz E would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2002 Mercedes-Benz E. (221 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 2002 Mercedes-Benz E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 725 kg more than 2002 Mercedes-Benz E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mercedes-Benz E. (315 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mercedes-Benz E.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-250 | 2002 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | E-250 | E |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 221 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 389 Nm | 315 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 84 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2370 kg | 1645 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 65 L |