2004 Ford E-250 vs. 2002 Volkswagen Sharan
To start off, 2004 Ford E-250 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Volkswagen Sharan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Volkswagen Sharan would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2002 Volkswagen Sharan. (150 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 2002 Volkswagen Sharan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 700 kg more than 2002 Volkswagen Sharan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Volkswagen Sharan. (220 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Volkswagen Sharan.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-250 | 2002 Volkswagen Sharan | |
Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
Model | E-250 | Sharan |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Body Type | Van | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 389 Nm | 220 Nm |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2370 kg | 1670 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 70 L |