2004 Ford E-250 vs. 2003 Chevrolet Blazer
To start off, 2004 Ford E-250 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2003 Chevrolet Blazer. (190 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 2003 Chevrolet Blazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 570 kg more than 2003 Chevrolet Blazer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Chevrolet Blazer. (339 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Chevrolet Blazer.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-250 | 2003 Chevrolet Blazer | |
Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
Model | E-250 | Blazer |
Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 4300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 389 Nm | 339 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 88.4 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2370 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2720 mm |