2004 Ford E-250 vs. 2004 GMC Yukon
To start off, both 2004 Ford E-250 and 2004 GMC Yukon were released in the same year (2004). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Yukon (325 HP) has 100 more horse power than 2004 Ford E-250. (225 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford E-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Yukon weights approximately 144 kg more than 2004 Ford E-250. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Yukon (495 Nm) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford E-250. (389 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford E-250.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-250 | 2004 GMC Yukon | |
Make | Ford | GMC |
Model | E-250 | Yukon |
Year Released | 2004 | 2004 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 5965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 325 HP |
Torque | 389 Nm | 495 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 92 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2370 kg | 2514 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2950 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 12.4 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 98 L |