2004 Ford E-250 vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, both 2004 Ford E-250 and 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL were released in the same year (2004). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 5,439 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL (493 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 268 more horse power than 2004 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford E-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 361 kg more than 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL (800 Nm) has 411 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford E-250. (389 Nm). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford E-250.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-250 | 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | E-250 | SL |
Year Released | 2004 | 2004 |
Body Type | Van | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 5439 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 493 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 389 Nm | 800 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 82.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 87 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2370 kg | 2009 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 12.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 80 L |