2004 Ford E-250 vs. 2005 Toyota RunX
To start off, 2005 Toyota RunX is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-250 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2005 Toyota RunX. (187 HP @ 7800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota RunX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1192 kg more than 2005 Toyota RunX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota RunX. (180 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota RunX.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-250 | 2005 Toyota RunX | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | E-250 | RunX |
Year Released | 2004 | 2005 |
Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Torque | 389 Nm | 180 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2370 kg | 1178 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 8.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 60 L |