2004 Ford E-250 vs. 2006 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2006 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-250 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda CX-7 (244 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2004 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford E-250.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda CX-7. (350 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda CX-7.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford E-250 | 2006 Mazda CX-7 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | E-250 | CX-7 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Van | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 2298 cc |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 244 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 389 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
