2004 Ford E-250 vs. 2007 Volvo S60
To start off, 2007 Volvo S60 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-250 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2007 Volvo S60. (168 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 2007 Volvo S60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 869 kg more than 2007 Volvo S60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Volvo S60. (230 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Volvo S60.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-250 | 2007 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | E-250 | S60 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2007 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 389 Nm | 230 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 90 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2370 kg | 1501 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 8.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 70 L |