2004 Ford E-250 vs. 2008 MG TF
To start off, 2008 MG TF is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-250 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2008 MG TF. (158 HP @ 6900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 2008 MG TF. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1176 kg more than 2008 MG TF. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 MG TF. (174 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 MG TF.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford E-250 | 2008 MG TF | |
| Make | Ford | MG |
| Model | E-250 | TF |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Van | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 6900 RPM |
| Torque | 389 Nm | 174 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 89.3 mm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2370 kg | 1194 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 50 L |
