2004 Ford E-250 vs. 2009 Nissan Frontier
To start off, 2009 Nissan Frontier is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-250 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Frontier (261 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2004 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Frontier should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford E-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 928 kg more than 2009 Nissan Frontier.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan Frontier. (381 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan Frontier.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-250 | 2009 Nissan Frontier | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | E-250 | Frontier |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | Van | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 3952 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 261 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 389 Nm | 381 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2370 kg | 1442 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 5580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 12.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 80 L |