2004 Ford E-250 vs. 2009 Volkswagen Citi
To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Citi is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-250 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 2009 Volkswagen Citi. (74 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 2009 Volkswagen Citi.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 272 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volkswagen Citi. (117 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volkswagen Citi.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-250 | 2009 Volkswagen Citi | |
Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
Model | E-250 | Citi |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1423 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 389 Nm | 117 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 77.4 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 49 L |