2004 Ford E-250 vs. 2010 Bentley Continental GT
To start off, 2010 Bentley Continental GT is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-250 would be higher. At 5,998 cc (12 cylinders), 2010 Bentley Continental GT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Bentley Continental GT (600 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 375 more horse power than 2004 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Bentley Continental GT should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford E-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 20 kg more than 2010 Bentley Continental GT.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Bentley Continental GT (750 Nm) has 361 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford E-250. (389 Nm). This means 2010 Bentley Continental GT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford E-250.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford E-250 | 2010 Bentley Continental GT | |
| Make | Ford | Bentley |
| Model | E-250 | Continental GT |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Van | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 5998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | W |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 600 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 389 Nm | 750 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2370 kg | 2350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4803 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1915 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1379 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2746 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 12.4 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 23.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 90 L |
