2004 Ford E-250 vs. 2010 Ford Ka
To start off, 2010 Ford Ka is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-250 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ka. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1315 kg more than 2010 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford Ka. (145 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford E-250 | 2010 Ford Ka | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | E-250 | Ka |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1247 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 389 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 69.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 82 mm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2370 kg | 1055 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 3630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2310 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 35 L |
