2004 Ford E-250 vs. 2012 Maybach 57
To start off, 2012 Maybach 57 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-250 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (12 cylinders), 2012 Maybach 57 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Maybach 57 (543 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 318 more horse power than 2004 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Maybach 57 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford E-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Maybach 57 weights approximately 365 kg more than 2004 Ford E-250. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Maybach 57 (899 Nm) has 510 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford E-250. (389 Nm). This means 2012 Maybach 57 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford E-250.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-250 | 2012 Maybach 57 | |
Make | Ford | Maybach |
Model | E-250 | 57 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 5500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 543 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 389 Nm | 899 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2370 kg | 2735 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 5728 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1981 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1575 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3391 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 12.4 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 23.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 110 L |