2004 Ford E-250 vs. 2012 Volvo S60
To start off, 2012 Volvo S60 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-250 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 761 kg more than 2012 Volvo S60.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-250 | 2012 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | E-250 | S60 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 0 HP |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2370 kg | 1609 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1864 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 67 L |