2004 Ford E-250 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Sonic
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Sonic is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-250 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 2013 Chevrolet Sonic. (134 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 2013 Chevrolet Sonic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1133 kg more than 2013 Chevrolet Sonic. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Chevrolet Sonic. (169 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Chevrolet Sonic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-250 | 2013 Chevrolet Sonic | |
Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
Model | E-250 | Sonic |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 389 Nm | 169 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 88 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2370 kg | 1237 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4399 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1735 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1517 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2685 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 46 L |