2004 Ford E-350 vs. 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220. (78 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 333 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220. (142 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-350 | 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | E-350 | 220 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 2195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 78 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 142 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90.1 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 72.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 6.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 48 L |