2004 Ford E-350 vs. 1967 Mercury Park Lane
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Park Lane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Park Lane would be higher. At 6,722 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Park Lane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mercury Park Lane (325 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2004 Ford E-350. (255 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mercury Park Lane should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford E-350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1062 kg more than 1967 Mercury Park Lane.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mercury Park Lane (602 Nm) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford E-350. (475 Nm). This means 1967 Mercury Park Lane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford E-350 | 1967 Mercury Park Lane | |
| Make | Ford | Mercury |
| Model | E-350 | Park Lane |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5408 cc | 6722 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 325 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 475 Nm | 602 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 2422 kg | 1360 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3130 mm |
