2004 Ford E-350 vs. 1967 MG MGB
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 MG MGB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 MG MGB would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1967 MG MGB. (97 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1967 MG MGB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1606 kg more than 1967 MG MGB. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 326 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 MG MGB. (149 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 MG MGB.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford E-350 | 1967 MG MGB | |
| Make | Ford | MG |
| Model | E-350 | MGB |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
| Body Type | Van | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5408 cc | 1798 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 97 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 475 Nm | 149 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2488 kg | 882 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 3900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2320 mm |
