2004 Ford E-350 vs. 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 7,462 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (248 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 688 kg more than 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass (502 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford E-350. (475 Nm). This means 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford E-350 | 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
| Model | E-350 | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5408 cc | 7462 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 248 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 475 Nm | 502 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 2488 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 5270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2850 mm |
