2004 Ford E-350 vs. 1976 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1976 Mercury Cougar. (152 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1976 Mercury Cougar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 392 kg more than 1976 Mercury Cougar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mercury Cougar. (377 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mercury Cougar.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford E-350 | 1976 Mercury Cougar | |
| Make | Ford | Mercury |
| Model | E-350 | Cougar |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1976 |
| Body Type | Van | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5408 cc | 5766 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 152 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 475 Nm | 377 Nm |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2422 kg | 2030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2910 mm |
