2004 Ford E-350 vs. 1976 Volvo 260
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 260. (148 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 260. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1072 kg more than 1976 Volvo 260. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 257 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Volvo 260. (218 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Volvo 260.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-350 | 1976 Volvo 260 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | E-350 | 260 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 218 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2422 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2660 mm |