2004 Ford E-350 vs. 1982 Reliant Scimitar
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Reliant Scimitar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Reliant Scimitar would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1982 Reliant Scimitar. (133 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1982 Reliant Scimitar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1122 kg more than 1982 Reliant Scimitar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 269 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Reliant Scimitar. (206 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Reliant Scimitar.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford E-350 | 1982 Reliant Scimitar | |
| Make | Ford | Reliant |
| Model | E-350 | Scimitar |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
| Body Type | Van | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5408 cc | 2792 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 133 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 475 Nm | 206 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2422 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2640 mm |
