2004 Ford E-350 vs. 1982 Zastava 1500
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 1500. (74 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1462 kg more than 1982 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 362 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 1500. (113 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 1500.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford E-350 | 1982 Zastava 1500 | |
| Make | Ford | Zastava |
| Model | E-350 | 1500 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 5408 cc | 1481 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 475 Nm | 113 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 2422 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2430 mm |
