2004 Ford E-350 vs. 1990 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Renault Clio would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 1990 Renault Clio. (62 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1990 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1517 kg more than 1990 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 357 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Renault Clio. (118 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-350 | 1990 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | E-350 | Clio |
Year Released | 2004 | 1990 |
Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 118 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 23.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2422 kg | 905 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1400 mm |