2004 Ford E-350 vs. 1992 Rover 620i
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 620i. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 620i would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1992 Rover 620i. (113 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 620i. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1233 kg more than 1992 Rover 620i. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 303 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 620i. (172 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 620i.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford E-350 | 1992 Rover 620i | |
| Make | Ford | Rover |
| Model | E-350 | 620i |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5408 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 113 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 475 Nm | 172 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 90.1 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 88 mm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2488 kg | 1255 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 65 L |
