2004 Ford E-350 vs. 1994 Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1994 Rover Range Rover. (134 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover Range Rover. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 307 kg more than 1994 Rover Range Rover. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover Range Rover. (271 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-350 | 1994 Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | E-350 | Range Rover |
Year Released | 2004 | 1994 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 271 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2422 kg | 2115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2750 mm |