2004 Ford E-350 vs. 1995 Mazda MX-3
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda MX-3 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1995 Mazda MX-3. (106 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda MX-3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1363 kg more than 1995 Mazda MX-3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 341 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda MX-3. (134 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda MX-3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-350 | 1995 Mazda MX-3 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | E-350 | MX-3 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1995 |
Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 134 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2422 kg | 1059 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 65 L |