2004 Ford E-350 vs. 1996 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1996 Mazda RX-7. (238 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda RX-7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1186 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda RX-7. (296 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-350 | 1996 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | E-350 | RX-7 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
Body Type | Van | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 238 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 296 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2488 kg | 1302 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 77 L |