2004 Ford E-350 vs. 1997 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1997 Jeep Cherokee. (120 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1997 Jeep Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1058 kg more than 1997 Jeep Cherokee. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 280 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Jeep Cherokee. (195 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Jeep Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-350 | 1997 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | E-350 | Cherokee |
Year Released | 2004 | 1997 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 2464 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 195 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90.1 mm | 98.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 81 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2488 kg | 1430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2580 mm |