2004 Ford E-350 vs. 1997 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1997 Jeep Wrangler. (114 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1997 Jeep Wrangler. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 972 kg more than 1997 Jeep Wrangler. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Jeep Wrangler. (280 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford E-350 | 1997 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Ford | Jeep |
| Model | E-350 | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1997 |
| Body Type | Van | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5408 cc | 2499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 475 Nm | 280 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2422 kg | 1450 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2380 mm |
