2004 Ford E-350 vs. 1997 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Renault Clio would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 196 more horse power than 1997 Renault Clio. (59 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1997 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1633 kg more than 1997 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 390 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Renault Clio. (85 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-350 | 1997 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | E-350 | Clio |
Year Released | 2004 | 1997 |
Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 1170 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 85 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90.1 mm | 75.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 64.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2488 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 38 L |