2004 Ford E-350 vs. 1998 Rover 75
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover 75 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1998 Rover 75. (150 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 997 kg more than 1998 Rover 75. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 290 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover 75. (185 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford E-350 | 1998 Rover 75 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | E-350 | 75 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 1993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 185 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2422 kg | 1425 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2780 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 66 L |